Links are not yet activated.
Is this your press release? Add a link to submitpr.org on your website and verify it — activation is instant and free.
Or upgrade once for permanent activation (from $19.95, pay with crypto).
The question, in two parts, is as follows.(i) Why was a prosecution not started in 1987 when the police had said they had forged documents?
(ii) Why did the government censor this affair (from the 1980s to the date of publication of this book)?
In 1987 a Deputy Chief Constable confirmed in a letter that he had "forged examination question papers".
A few words of explanation here. It's perhaps not easy for a member of the public, or indeed a journalist, to understand that the Deputy Chief Constable confirmed that he had "forged examination question papers". "How can that be", says a member of the public. So I will add that the examination papers had been altered (by a university member of staff) to deceive and defraud me. Hence the examination question papers were forged documents.